Legal Opinion

Lizdo v. Gentec Equipment

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2002No. 2001-SC-0139-WCPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

REVERSING AND REMANDING

The Court of Appeals has reversed the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) and reinstated an Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ’s) decision to the effect that because the employer complied with KRS 342.040(1), the failure of the Commissioner of the Department of Workers’ Claims (Commissioner) to notify the claimant of his right to prosecute did not toll the period of limitations. We have concluded, however, that a finding that the employer complied with KRS 342.040(1) was unreasonable under the evidence. Therefore, we reverse.

The claimant alleged that on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Special Fund v. FrancisKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. WhittakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1994

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Letcher Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. HallMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Patrick v. Christopher East Health CareKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Kentucky Container Service, Inc. v. AshbrookKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Glenn Davis v. Blendex CompanyKentucky Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Marquis Carter v. Webasto Roof SystemsKentucky Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API