Legal Opinion

State v. Crandall

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1986No. 85-0557-CRPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinmetz, J.

The issue in this case is whether the due process clause of the Wisconsin Constitution, article I, section 8(1) 1 requires that a defendant accused of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated be warned that a refusal to submit to a chemical breath test can be used against her as evidence at tried.

The facts of the case are that in the early evening hours of August 19, 1983, Jean L. Crandall was stopped by police. She was driving ten miles per hour under the speed limit and weaving across the center line to the shoulder of the road. The arresting officer smelled alcohol on the defendant’s…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Scales v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. NeitzelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. ZielkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. PiddingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. WilkeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  4. State v. ReitterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API