Sauer Inc. v. Honeywell Building Solutions SES Corp.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT
GIBSON, District Judge.
I. SYNOPSIS
This matter comes before the Court on a motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 24) filed by the Defendant, Honeywell Building Solutions SES Corporation (“Honeywell”), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. The Plaintiff, Sauer Incorporated (“Sauer”), opposes the Motion for Summary Judgment. For the rea sons that follow, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
II. BACKGROUND
Sempra Energy Services (“Sempra”) was the general contractor for a construction project conducted at the Conemaugh Valley Memorial…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Robin Chamberlain v. Vincent C. Giampapa, M.D., Individually and Dba Plastic Surgery Center InternationaleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Richard Conoshenti v. Public Service Electric & Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States ex rel. Chasney & Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2016
- BAUGUESS ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC. v. HOSPITALITY BUILDERS, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- MILLS v. ATRIUM MEDICAL CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023