Planet Insurance v. Wong
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtScholfield, J.
Emanoil and Rodica Muresan appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of Planet Insurance Company. The Muresans argue that Planet acted in bad faith while performing its duty to defend under a reservation of rights and that they have the right to enforce Planet’s duty of good faith owed to its insured. The Muresans also argue that Planet’s prohibited use clause is void as against public policy and is unenforceable under the Washington doctrine of procedural unconscionability. We affirm.
On July 1,1991, Siu Cheung Ng a.k.a. Samuel Ng, then 21 years old, entered into an automobile…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ora Lee Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company, William Thorne v. Walker-Thomas Furniture CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Marincovich v. TarabochiaWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Schroeder v. Fageol Motors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Luna v. Household Finance Corp. IIIDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2002
- Simmons v. PuuHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
- Mendoza v. Rivera-ChavezWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Washington Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. RamseyAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Mendoza v. Rivera-ChavezWashington Supreme Court · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.