Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Puu

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 2004No. 23714PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

LEVINSON, J.

The plaintiff-appellant Curtis Simmons [hereinafter, “Curtis”] appeals from the final judgment of the second circuit court, the Honorable Shackley F. Raffetto presiding, filed on August 2, 2000. 1

Curtis’s sole contention on appeal is that the circuit court erred in entering a January 18, 2000 order granting the motion of the defendants-appellees Gary Puu [hereinafter, “Gary”] and the Hertz Corporation [hereinafter, “Hertz”] [collectively hereinafter, “the Appellees”] for partial summary judgment regarding unfair claims settlement practices, filed on October…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. English v. FischerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Querubin v. ThronasHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Durette v. Aloha Plastic Recycling, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Jou v. National Interstate Ins. Co. of Haw.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Silva v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Newcomb v. Cambridge Home Loans, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2012

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API