Legal Opinion

Washington Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Ramsey

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1996No. S-6272PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

I. .INTRODUCTION

This appeal arises out of an action brought by Michele Ramsey against the Washington Insurance Guaranty Association (WIGA). A jury awarded Ramsey $200,000 after finding that WIGA had violated its duty to reasonably settle an underlying personal injury action. In this appeal, WIGA argues that the superior court improperly determined that it had personal jurisdiction over WIGA. WIGA also contends that it is statutorily immune from an action for refusal to settle. WIGA further contends that because it did not violate any duty it owed to its insureds,…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Jones v. Florida Ins. Guar. Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. Great Divide Insurance Co. v. Carpenter Ex Rel. ReedAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Bills v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty FundCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. American Employers' Insurance v. Elf Atochem North America, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  5. Grace v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API