Legal Opinion

Basinger v. Sullivan

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1989No. 75A03-8804-CV-103PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRARD, Presiding Judge.

This case presents an extremely unfortunate chronicle of malpractice. The sole question before us on appeal is whether under the cireumstances attorney James L. Sullivan should be held to respond for the damages suffered by plaintiffs (referred to collectively as Basingers). The trial court determined that he should not and entered summary judgment in his favor.

The undisputed facts may be briefly summarized. In 1977 a physician operated on Pamela, but performed surgery on the wrong knee. Subsequently, Basingers consulted Sullivan. On June 25, 1979 he filed a timely…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shideler v. DwyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Guy v. SCHULDTIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  3. French v. Hickman Moving & StorageIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Spoljaric v. PanganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Bailey v. MartzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Laird v. BlackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Adams v. PaulCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Hildebrand v. HildebrandDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1990
  4. Epstein v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  5. Schultheis v. FrankeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API