Legal Opinion
Schultheis v. Franke
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 5, 1995No. 57A05-9401-CV-32PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RUCKER, Judge.
In this action based on attorney malpractice, - Defendants-Appellants Richard L. Schultheis and The Law Office of Richard L. Schultheis, P.C. (collectively "Schultheis") contest the jury's verdict in favor of their former - client, - Plaintiff-Appeliee - Gene Franke. In so doing they raise six issues for our review which we consolidate and rephrase as:
1) Whether the trial court erroneously refused to allow Schultheis to amend his answer to include non-party defenses?
2) Whether the trial court erred in permitting Dr. Kenneth Borow to testify as an expert?
3) Whether the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ralph W. Moores, Jr. v. Nathan Greenberg, Ralph W. Moores, Jr. v. Nathan GreenbergCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Campagnola v. MulhollandNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & KeefeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. Terre Haute Industries, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Vergara Ex Rel. Vergara v. DoanIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Carbone v. TierneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Clary v. Lite MacHines Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Gregory & Swapp, PLLC v. KranendonkUtah Supreme Court · 2018
- Pamela Sue Hook v. Tito Trevino, Individually, and Tito Trevino D/B/A Trevino Law OfficesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Horn v. WoosterWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.