Legal Opinion
Redfield v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 6, 1963No. Nos. 18167, 18168PublishedCited by 121 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.
These two appeals have been consolidated for argument and disposition in this court. One (No. 18167) involves the denial of alternative motions; one, made under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, to vacate, set aside or correct an alleged illegal sentence, and the other, made under Rule 35, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, to correct the same sentence. The other appeal (No. 18168) involves the denial of an application for a writ of habeas corpus.
Lavere Redfield, the appellant in both appeals, was convicted on a jury verdict in the United States District Court for the District of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Poe v. SeabornSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- Anant Kumar Tripati v. Gary L. HenmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Robert G. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Robert C. ThetfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Booth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- State v. KennerIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.