Legal Opinion
Brignoli v. Balch Hardy & Scheinman, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 12, 1990No. 86 Civ. 4103 (RWS)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Arie E. David (“David”) and the law firm practicing under the name Law Offices of Arie E. David (“Law Offices”) have moved pursuant to Rule 3(j) of the Civil Rules of the Southern District and Rules 59 and 60, Fed.R.Civ.P., to reargue the opinion of this court dated November 30, 1989 (the “November Opinion”) , 1989 WL 146767, which movants object to “in its entirety as a complete fabric of mistakes of fact and law.” For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted for the limited purpose of considering the effect of the subsequently rendered Supreme Court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Oliveri v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Calloway v. Marvel Entertainment GroupCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Caleb & Co. v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Apex Oil Company v. The Belcher Company of New York, Inc. And Belcher New Jersey, Inc., Shea & GouldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Dietrich v. BauerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- System Management Arts Inc. v. Avesta Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Mina Investment Holdings Ltd. v. LefkowitzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Primavera Familienstifung v. AskinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Lehmuller v. Incorporated Village of Sag HarborDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.