Legal Opinion
Caleb & Co. v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 31, 1985No. 84 Civ. 4075(RWS)PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Caleb & Company and Unit & Co. (“Caleb”) have brought a motion for an order pursuant to Rule 3(j) of the Civil Rules for the Southern District of New York granting reargument of that portion of the court’s July 26, 1985 opinion which dismissed Caleb’s second cause of action “to the extent that it is premised on an obligation to pay promptly prior to August 17.”
The standard for granting a motion for reargument is strict in order to dissuade repetitive arguments on issues that have already been considered fully by the court. Such motions, therefore, may…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- 67 Wall Street Co. v. Franklin National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- New York Guardian Mortgagee Corp. v. ClelandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Viacom International, Inc. v. Lorimar Productions, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Caleb & Co. v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Ocean Transport Line, Inc. v. American Philippine Fiber Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
3Cited by62 opinions
- German by German v. Federal Home Loan Mortg. Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Houbigant, Inc. v. ACB Mercantile, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Shamis v. Ambassador Factors Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Morser v. AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMSDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Dietrich v. BauerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.