Legal Opinion
Robles v. Employment Development Department
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 5, 2015No. A139774PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REARDON, J. —
This controversy — which involves the wrongful denial of unemployment compensation benefits — began in January 2010 because of a pair of shoes. More than five years later, appellant Employment Development Department (EDD or the Department) continues to refuse to award Jose Robles (Robles) the benefits to which he would have been entitled absent the Department’s error, this despite being ordered to do so twice by the trial court and once by this court. (See Robles v. Employment Development Dept. (2012) 207 Cal.App.4th 1029 [144 Cal.Rptr.3d 36] (Robles /).) Most recently, in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- California Department of Human Resources Development v. JavaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Gilles v. Department of Human Resources DevelopmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Brown v. Cal. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Luxor Cabs, Inc. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Robles v. Emp't Dev. Dep't, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Next Century Assocs., LLC v. Cnty. of L. A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- San Diego Unified Port Dist. v. Cal. Coastal Comm'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.