Legal Opinion

Luxor Cabs, Inc. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided December 4, 2018No. A147962PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REARDON, J.**

*974In this case involving the provision of workers' compensation insurance to Luxor Cabs, Inc. and Luxor Executive Car Service, LLC (Luxor), appellants Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Company, Inc. (AUCRA), California Insurance Company (CIC), and certain other affiliated entities1 challenge the denial of AUCRA's motion to compel arbitration pursuant to the terms of a reinsurance participation agreement (RPA) between Luxor and AUCRA. In particular, appellants argue that the trial court erred both in determining the issue of arbitrability-given the existence of a valid…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Minnieland Private Day School, Inc. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jackpot Harvesting, Inc. v. Applied Underwriters, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Adir International v. The Travelers Indemnity CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Banister v. Marinidence Opco, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Bolthouse Farms, Inc. v. Atkinson Staffing, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. Jackpot Harvesting, Inc. v. Applied Underwriters, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API