Legal Opinion
United States v. Interborough Delicatessen Dealers Ass'n
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 4, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVET, District Judge.
The defendants Cohen, Pines and Molod have moved pursuant to Rules 6(e), 12 and 57(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to dismiss the indictment against them. The defendants contend that the United States government in its preparation and presentation of this case used evidence given by them in an investigation conducted by the New York State Attorney General.
The defendants Cohen and Pines were subpoenaed and testified under oath before an Assistant State Attorney General. The defendant Molod appeared voluntarily and testified under oath before an Assistant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. MoniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States Ex Rel. Vajtauer v. Commissioner of ImmigrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Emspak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Laino v. Warden of Wallkill PrisonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- United States v. Sharon RoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- People v. McAdooCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1965