Legal Opinion
People v. McAdoo
Criminal Court of the City of New York
Decided March 22, 1965PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam E. Ringel, P. J.
The defendants are each charged with violation of subdivision 6 of section 600 of the Penal Law (criminal contempt), as a misdemeanor.
They appeared before the Second August 1964 Grand Jury, pursuant to subpoena, were sworn, and refused to answer certain
*665questions,* after immunity had been conferred. This Grand Jury had been impaneled for the purpose of determining if a conspiracy existed to instigate the Harlem riots of July, 1964, and to inquire into acts relating thereto. Anderson executed a limited waiver of immunity, not pertinent here. Douglas alone *666was advised as to the purpose of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. Calbud, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. IannielloNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- DeBose v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
- In Re Subpoena Duces Tecum Directed to DillonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1992
- DeBose v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.