United States v. Sharon Rose
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant Rose was called as a witness for the prosecution in a criminal trial in the district court for the District of Oregon. On the date scheduled for trial, appellant notified the court that she would invoke her Fifth Amendment privilege against compelled self-incrimination. In an in camera proceeding, the trial court upheld her claim of privilege and granted the prosecution a one-day continuance to seek an immunity order.
The trial began the next day. Because the government had not yet received written authorization to grant immunity, the prosecution, on instructions from the bench,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AntelopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. John Allen Powers William Nichols, Contemnor/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Aleksandrs v. LaurinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- State v. Cardenas-AlvarezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. SnyderNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- United States v. Index Newspapers LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. KimseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.