Legal Opinion
Garcia & Maggini Co. v. Washington Dehydrated Food Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 7, 1924No. 4055PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUNT, ■ Circuit Judge.
This is an action for damages, alleging breach of a contract. The Dehydrated Company, plaintiff below, had judgment.
Garcia & Maggini Company, a corporation, in a written contract made in June, 1919, agreed to buy from the Dehydrated Company, *766which agreed to sell, 60,000 pounds, net choice evaporated apples at lSi^cents per pound, f. o. b. Pacific Coast rail shipping point. The seller, Dehydrated Company, was privileged to substitute grades, “providing cannot fill order with grade ordered at extra choice, 19 cents, fancy 19% cents.” In this action the Dehydrated Company…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Coghlan v. South Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Berlet v. Lehigh Valley Silk MillsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
- Pabst Brewing Co. v. E. Clemens Horst Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Clausen v. M/V New CarissaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Griffin Grocery Co. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Geo. A. Moore & Co. v. MathieuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Byron Jackson Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1940
- Nye & Nisson v. Weed Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.