Legal Opinion

Wilshire v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1929No. 21786. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Plaintiff, being the owner of a tract of shore land on the borders of Lake Union in the city of Seattle, instituted this action for the purpose of recovering judgment against the city of Seattle, a city of the first class, for a sum alleged to be due him by reason of the use and occupation by the city of his property. The case is before us upon plaintiff’s appeal from a judgment dismissing the action, entered by the court after sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s third amended complaint, upon which complaint plaintiff elected to stand.

The material allegations of this complaint are, briefly…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kincaid v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Aylmore v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Jacobs v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Jacobs v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Kakeldy v. Columbia & Puget Sound Railroad Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brazil v. City of AuburnWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Systems Amusement, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  3. City of Walla Walla v. ConkeyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  4. Little v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Blankenship v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API