Wilshire v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.
Plaintiff, being the owner of a tract of shore land on the borders of Lake Union in the city of Seattle, instituted this action for the purpose of recovering judgment against the city of Seattle, a city of the first class, for a sum alleged to be due him by reason of the use and occupation by the city of his property. The case is before us upon plaintiff’s appeal from a judgment dismissing the action, entered by the court after sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s third amended complaint, upon which complaint plaintiff elected to stand.
The material allegations of this complaint are, briefly…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kincaid v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Aylmore v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Jacobs v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Jacobs v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Kakeldy v. Columbia & Puget Sound Railroad Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brazil v. City of AuburnWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Systems Amusement, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- City of Walla Walla v. ConkeyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
- Little v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Blankenship v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.