Legal Opinion

Horton v. Royal Order of the Sun

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1991No. 880490PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Larry Horton brought suit against two private clubs, the Royal Order of the Sun (“the Sun”) and Studebaker’s, for personal injuries he sustained as a result of his voluntary intoxication. The district court granted defendants’ motions to dismiss under Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Utah R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Horton appeals. He argues that the Dramshop Act, found in section 32A-14-101 of the Code, provides intoxicated persons who injure themselves a cause of action against the provider of the intoxicants. Utah Code Ann. § 32A-14-101 (1991). We hold that the Dramshop Act…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. St. Benedict's Development Co. v. St. Benedict's HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Colman v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Schurtz v. BMW of North America, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Nolan v. MorelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  5. Cory v. ShierlohCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Lyon v. BurtonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Tanya Copier, Deceased, by and Through Bree Renee Lindsey, Her Personal Representative v. Smith & Wesson Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. Tobin v. Norwood Country Club, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  4. Adkins v. Uncle Bart's, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Harnischfeger Engineers, Inc. v. Uniflo Conveyor, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API