Legal Opinion

Unite Here Local 30 v. Department of Parks & Recreation

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 2011No. C063147PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HULL, J.

In 2004, following a competitive bidding process, defendant Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) awarded real parties in interest Delaware North Companies Parks & Resorts, Inc. (DNCPR), and Delaware North Companies Parks & Resorts at San Diego (DNCPRSD) (hereafter collectively Delaware North) a contract to operate a concession at the Old Town San Diego State Historic Park for a period of 10 years (the Concession Contract). However, after only four years, DPR approved Delaware North’s assignment of the Concession Contract to real party in interest Old Town Family Hospitality…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. Fresno Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Service Employees International Union, Local 99 v. Options—A Child Care & Human Services AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. 5401 Associates, L.People v. State of Cal. CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Davis v. Fresno Unified School Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Fair Education Santa Barbara v. Santa Barbara Unified etc.California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API