Legal Opinion

Knight v. Pang

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1948No. 30556PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

The plaintiff in this action, Charles F. Knight, was struck and injured by an automobile driven by the defendant Allen K. Pang, October 18, 1946, at about a quarter past seven o’clock in the evening, at the intersection of First avenue south and Hanford street in the city of Seattle. He instituted this action against Mr. Pang, Jee Wong and Jane Doe Wong, his wife (owners of the car), and Jung Pang and Jane Doe Pang, his wife, for the recovery of damages due to the injuries which he suffered as the result of the accident.

The action was tried upon plaintiff’s amended complaint (which will…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Scholz v. LeuerWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Estill v. BerryWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Howe v. West Seattle Land & Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1899
  5. State v. RefsnesWashington Supreme Court · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Provins v. BevisWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Jackson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Sunset Oil Co. v. VertnerWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Robillard v. Selah-Moxee Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Beireis v. LeslieWashington Supreme Court · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API