Samuel v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SMITH-RIBNER.
Larry Pitt & Associates (Pitt), attorneys for Christophine Samuel, petition for review of the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ). The WCJ approved a compromise and release agreement but concluded that Pitt failed to establish that an attorney’s fee in excess of 20 percent was warranted. Pitt questions whether a WCJ has the power to limit the attorney’s fee as set forth in a compromise and release agreement in light of Section 449 of the Workers’ Compensation Act, (Act), Act of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. KohlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Bar Ass'n v. ThornburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. SternSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Weidner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Seitzinger v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Lawson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. NoelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. NoelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- I. Henry-Aiken v. WCAB (Vanguard Group, Inc.) Petition of: L. Pitt, Esq.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.