Legal Opinion

Lawson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 7, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

President Judge COLINS.

Larry Pitt & Associates (Pitt), attorney for Marjorie Lawson (Claimant), petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) that approved a compromise and release agreement by stipulation between Lawson and Temple University (Employer), denied Employer’s termination petition as moot, and awarded Pitt counsel fees in the amount of 20 percent of Claimant’s award while denying Pitt’s application for counsel fees in excess of 20 percent of said award.

The following facts…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. KohlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Eugenie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. SternSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Weidner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Seitzinger v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Mayo v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. I. Henry-Aiken v. WCAB (Vanguard Group, Inc.) Petition of: L. Pitt, Esq.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. R. Neves v. WCAB (American Airlines)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API