Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Seitzinger v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 28, 2011No. 838 M.D. 2010PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge BROBSON.

In this original jurisdiction action, petitioners Wilbur Seitzinger, Esquire, and his law firm, Seitzinger and Randazzo (hereafter Law Firm), filed a petition for review (PFR) through which Law Firm seeks declaratory and injunctive relief against the Commonwealth, Department of Labor and Industry and two Department officials (hereafter collectively referred to as the Department). Law Firm rests its request for relief upon the claim that fee-limitation provisions in the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act 1 (the Act) are unconstitutional under Article V, Section…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. O'Donoghue v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Wajert v. State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Eugenie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. SternSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Zauflik, A., Aplt. v. Pennsbury School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. MCT Transportation Inc. v. Philadelphia Parking AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Zauflik v. Pennsbury School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. G. Thomas v. P. GrimmCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Germantown Cab Co. v. Philadelphia Parking AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API