Legal Opinion
Clark v. International Union, United Mine Workers
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided December 7, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-0090-APublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GLEN M. WILLIAMS, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motion of the International Union, United Mine Workers of America (“the Union”) for the dismissal of fines the court imposed as civil sanctions for contempt. The motion is unopposed by the plaintiff, the National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”). The court will deny the motion.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On April 5, 1989, the Union began a strike against the Pittston Coal Group (“Pittston”). Clinchfield Coal Company (“Clinchfield”) is a subsidiary of Pittston. The strike followed months of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bagwell v. International Union, UMWASupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
- Carbon Fuel Co. v. USX Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 91-02922Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- International Union, United Mine Workers of America v. Clinchfield Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
- International Union, United Mine Workers of America v. Clinchfield Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1991