Legal Opinion
Bagwell v. International Union, UMWA
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided November 6, 1992No. 910634, 920299PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stephenson
In these consolidated appeals, the principal issue we address involves the validity and enforceability of certain contempt fines imposed by the trial court against International Union, United Mine Workers of America and International Union, United Mine Workers of America, District 28 (collectively, the Union) for the Union’s violation of the court’s injunction.
I
In early April 1989, the Union called a strike against Clinchfield Coal Company and Sea “B” Mining Company (collectively, the Company) after the expiration of a collective bargaining agreement between the parties. Thereafter, the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lee v. SpodenSupreme Court of Virginia · 2015
- Dunning v. TallmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Ghameshlouy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
- Powell v. WardCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.