Legal Opinion
Carbon Fuel Co. v. USX Corp.
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided July 5, 1995No. Civ. A. 2:93-1073PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending are eight motions for summary judgment. 1 Defendants USX Corporation and U.S. Steel Mining Co. (collectively “USX”) filed four motions for summary judgment. 2 Plaintiff Carbon Fuel Co. (“Carbon Fuel”), and Third-Party Defendants Consolidation Coal Co. (“Consol”), Old Ben Coal Co. (“Old Ben”), and Arch Mineral Corp. and Arch of Kentucky (collectively “Arch”) have each filed one motion for summary judgment. For reasons set forth below, the motion of USX against Carbon Fuel is GRANTED. Further, the motions of Arch, Consol, and Old Ben…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Holland v. Double G Coal Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
- Carbon Fuel Company v. USX CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Buckner v. Westmoreland Coal Co. (In Re Westmoreland Coal Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1997
- Holland v. High-Tech Collieries, Inc.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1996
- In Re Lady H Coal Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.