Legal Opinion

Dakota Tribal Industries v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 5, 1995No. 94-1051 CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HODGES, Judge.

Plaintiff seeks reformation of a contract with the General Services Administration to correct a unilateral mistake in its bid. After trial, we determined that the facts of this case could not support this type of equitable remedy. We must rule for defendant.

FACTS

Plaintiff is a small business contractor pursuant to the section 8(a) set-aside program of the Small Business Administration. See 15 U.S.C. § 687(a). It submitted a bid in response to a 1992 General Services Administration solicitation to provide chain saw chaps. Plaintiffs offer listed the total cost per unit for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ruggiero v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  2. Liebherr Crane Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  3. Wender Presses, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  4. Aydin Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  5. BCM Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Griffy's Landscape Maintenance LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  2. Giesler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  3. Will H. Hall & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API