Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Havener

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1959No. 9807PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE CASTLES:

This is an appeal from a judgment of the- district court of Blaine County, in which judgment the court adjudged that the defendants had a valid mining claim in their Mitch No. 33 superior to the plaintiffs’ Ajax and War Bonnet claims.

The mining claims involved are all located in the east half of Section 21, Township 33 north, Range 22 east in Blaine County. Both parties located placer claims, for bentonite. The location of the claims with reference to each other are best described by two plats of the half section as follows:

*439

The chronology of events leading up to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Butte & Superior Copper Co. v. Clark-Montana Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Ferris v. McNallyMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Clark-Montana Realty Co. v. Butte & Superior Copper Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1916
  4. Purdum v. LaddinMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Butte & Superior Copper Co. v. Clark-Montana Realty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bagg v. New Jersey Loan CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Shope v. SimsAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Martinson v. Michael (In Re Michael)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 1995
  4. Claybaugh v. GancarzNevada Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Martinson v. Michael (In Re Michael)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API