Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Kirby v. Nolte

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 20, 1943No. 38661PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

In 1941 the people of St. Louis voted to amend the city’s charter. The general purpose of the amendment' was to provide a form of civil service for city employees in the classified service designed so, as to insure employment and continuity of service on grounds of merit and fitness. The amendment has been before this court several [392] times through attacks on its constitutionality and on other grounds. See State ex inf. v. Kirby, 349 Mo. 988, 163 S. W. (2d) 990; Kirby v. Nolte, 349 Mo. 1015, 164 S. W. (2d) 1; State ex rel. v. Kirby, 349 Mo. 1010, 163 S. W. (2d) 964. We upheld its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Rothrum v. DarbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  2. Kansas City v. BaconSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  3. State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. KirbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  4. Kirby v. NolteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  5. Kansas City v. MastinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. St. Louis Fire Fighters Ass'n Local No. 73 v. StemmlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  2. In Re Estate of HoganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  3. Sanders v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  4. Gilmore v. ThompsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Abernathy v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API