Legal Opinion
Turpan v. Merriman
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 2, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
57 N.J. Super. 590 (1959)
155 A.2d 266
ALEXIS TURPAN, AN INFANT BY HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, HARRY TURPAN, AND HARRY TURPAN, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
ELLIOT MERRIMAN, EDITH MERRIMAN AND MERRI HOMES, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 5, 1959.
Decided November 2, 1959.
Before Judges CONFORD, FOLEY and SCHALICK.
Mr. Robert B. Kroner argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents (Messrs. Cummis & Kroner, attorneys).
Mr. Thomas V. Weaver argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Messrs. Reid & Flaherty,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wytupeck v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Strang v. South Jersey Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Simmel v. New Jersey Coop Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Harris v. Mentes-Williams Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- HOFF EX REL. HOFF v. Natural Refining Products Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pocholec v. GIUSTINAOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Scheck v. Houdaille Const. Materials, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- Ostroski v. Mount Prospect Shoprite, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Vega v. PiedilatoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Samuel Fulginiti, a Minor by His Guardian, Michael A. Marolla v. Peter Tocco and Margaret M. ToccoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972