Legal Opinion

Wytupeck v. City of Camden

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 16, 1957PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

There was judgment for the plaintiffs on a jury verdict rendered in the Law Division of the Superior Court in this action for negligence in the condition and use of the defendant city’s lands; and the case is here by our certification of the city’s appeal to the Appellate Division of the Superior Court.

The basic question raised concerns the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding of a breach of “duty owing” by the city to the infant plaintiff in these circumstances:

The mishap befell the infant May 15, 1954, on the city’s lands…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Lebeck v. William A. Jarvis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  3. Bartleson v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. James v. Wisconsin Power & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Melanson v. Reed Bros.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Di Cosala v. KaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Weinberg v. DingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  3. Jersey Central Power & Light Co. v. Melcar Utility Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  4. Sidney Lundy Claire Lundy v. Adamar of New Jersey, Inc., T/a Trop World, Defendant/third Party v. Dr. Domenic Frank Carlino, Individually Dr. Domenic Frank Carlino, a Professional Association, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. McIntosh v. MilanoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API