Legal Opinion

Pocholec v. GIUSTINA

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1960PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is an action to recover damages for the death of Ronnie Pocholec, a nine-year old boy, who drowned in the defendant’s log pond. The plaintiff, administrator of the decedent’s estate, appeals from a judgment entered upon a verdict for the defendant.

The defendant maintains a log pond at Springfield, Oregon, on land in its possession and under its control. The pond, which covers approximately 20 acres, was constructed by defendant in 1951. It is used as a storage place for logs which are eventually cut into lumber at defendant’s mill in Eugene. The pond is enclosed by a dike; the surface is…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Brown v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Courtell v. McEachenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Price v. Atchison Water Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  4. Lone Star Gas Co. v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. King v. LennenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Mathis v. Massachusetts Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. VEGA BY MUNIZ v. PiedilatoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  3. Nielsen v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Haddad v. First National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  5. Bosin v. Oak Lodge Sanitary District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API