Reichman v. Poshmark, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
Honorable Dana M. Sabraw, United States District Judge
Pending before the Court is Defendant Poshmark, Inc.’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff Christopher J. Reichman’s Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and (6) of the Federal Rules, of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion, and Defendant filéd a reply. For the following reasons, the Court grants in part and denies in part the motion,
I
BACKGROUND
Defendant operates a mobile application (“app”) that provides users with a platform to sell and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Doe v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Tuck v. Yelp, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2025
- Wilson v. Rater8, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021