Legal Opinion
Tuck v. Yelp, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 5, 2025No. 3:25-cv-02155Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROY TUCK, Case No.: 3:25-cv-02155-JES-SBC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 13 v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 14 YELP, INC., [ECF No. 2] 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 Before the Court is Plaintiff Roy Tuck’s motion for leave to proceed in forma 21 pauperis (“IFP”). ECF No. 2. After due consideration and for the reasons set forth below, 22 the Court GRANTS the motion to proceed IFP. 23 I. Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 24 Parties instituting a civil action must pay a filing fee of $405 unless they are…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Maria Escobedo v. Apple American GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.