Legal Opinion
Davis v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 24, 1994No. C4-93-874, C6-93-1122, C8-93-1123, C3-93-1143, C7-93-1226, C9-93-1227, C0-93-1228, C2-93-1229, C4-93-1393 and C6-93-1394PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEITH, Chief Justice.
This case, 1 involving consolidated appeals, grew out of the legislature’s response to this court’s decision in Friedman v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 473 N.W.2d 828 (Minn.1991). Friedman held that under the Minnesota Constitution, DWI arrestees have a limited right to have a reasonable amount of time to attempt to consult with counsel by telephone before deciding whether to comply with the statutory requirement that they submit to implied consent testing. 473 N.W.2d at 837. After the decision in Friedman was filed, the legislature changed the standard implied…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Hamilton v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Fedziuk v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Humenansky v. Minnesota Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Bendorf v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.