Legal Opinion

Daggett & Ramsdell, Inc. v. Procter & Gamble Company

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 15, 1960No. Patent Appeal 6526Published

1Opinion of the Court

275 F.2d 955

DAGGETT & RAMSDELL, INC.

v.

PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY.

Patent Appeal No. 6526.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

March 15, 1960.

Mead, Browne, Schuyler & Beveridge, William E. Schuyler, Jr., Andrew B. Beveridge, Washington, D. C. (Francis C. Browne, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

Allen & Allen, Cincinnati, Ohio (Erastus S. Allen, Cincinnati, Ohio, of counsel), for appellee.

Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN, and SMITH, Judges, and Judge FRANCIS L. VAN DUSEN.*

MARTIN, Judge.

1

This appeal is from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, acting…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shoe Corporation of America v. Juvenile Shoe Corporation of AmericaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  2. Meyer Chemical Company v. Anahist Co., Inc., (Warner-Lambert Pharmaceutical Company, Assignee, Substituted)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  3. Daggett & Ramsdell, Inc. v. Procter & Gamble CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  4. Sundure Paint Corporation v. Maas & Waldstein Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API