Legal Opinion

Sundure Paint Corporation v. Maas & Waldstein Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 30, 1959No. Patent Appeal 6453PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, acting through the Assistant Commissioner, reversing the decision of the Examiner of Interferences, and sustaining the opposition brought by appellee, Maas & Wald-stein Co., to the application for registration of “Plextrum” 1 for an “acrylic masonry coating.” Opposer’s earlier use and ownership of the trademark “Plextone” 2 for “industrial coating finishes for producing multiple-colored film coatings” are conceded.

The Commissioner found that the products bearing the marks in issue each “ * * * fall in the broad…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shoe Corporation of America v. Juvenile Shoe Corporation of AmericaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  2. The May Department Stores Company v. Kenya CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chicago Pharmacal Company v. American Home Products CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  2. Daggett & Ramsdell, Inc. v. Procter & Gamble CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  3. Kristinus Gesellschaft, Mit Beschrankter Haftung v. Murray, Sons & Co., LimitedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API