Legal Opinion
Daggett & Ramsdell, Inc. v. Procter & Gamble Company
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided March 15, 1960No. Patent Appeal 6526PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
This appeal is from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, acting through the Assistant Commissioner, affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences dismissing the opposition by Daggett & Ramsdell, Inc., to the registration of “Personal Blend.”
The Procter & Gamble Co. on December 13, 1954, filed an application for the registration of the mark “Personal Blend” on “Shampoo,” alleging the first use in commerce to be on August 3, 1954. Daggett & Ramsdell, Inc. filed an opposition based on its registration “Personal Choice” 1 for use on after shave lotion, cologne, talc…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Luther Bailey v. Lee Henslee, Superintendent of the Arkansas State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Shoe Corporation of America v. Juvenile Shoe Corporation of AmericaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- Dickinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
3Cited by4 opinions
- Massey Junior College, Inc. v. Fashion Institute of TechnologyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Johnson & Johnson v. DiazDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1971
- Morton-Norwich Products, Inc. v. S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Daggett & Ramsdell, Inc. v. Procter & Gamble CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960