Legal Opinion
McGrath Holding Corporation v. Anzell
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 2, 1932No. 322PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff owns the Alexander patents, No. 1,703,940 and No. 1,719,821, the first for a tire mirror and the second for a hinge mirror, both used on automobiles. No. 1,701,940 was found below not to have been infringed, and No. 1,719,821 valid and infringed as to daim x and ^ in£ringed M to claim 2, the claims sued on.
The hinge mirror patent consists of a C-shaped clamp to which a mirror is attached, the clamp being designed for attachment over the projecting ends of the hinge pin on the door hinge of a closed automobile. The clamp consists of two L-shaped portions,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bassick Mfg. Co. v. Adams Grease Gun CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Rosenberg v. Carr Fastener Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Langan v. Warren Axe & Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911
- Backstay Machine & Leather Co. v. Zenite Metal Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1923
3Cited by5 opinions
- Heyl & Patterson, Incorporated, and Cross-Appellee v. McDowell Company, Incorporated, and Norfolk and Western Railway Company, and Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Denominational Envelope Co. v. Duplex Envelope Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- Condenser Development Corp. v. Davega-City Radio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Mahaffy & Harder Engineering Co. v. Standard Packaging Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1966
- J. S. Thorn Co. v. Michael Flynn Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1938