Heyl & Patterson, Incorporated, and Cross-Appellee v. McDowell Company, Incorporated, and Norfolk and Western Railway Company, and Cross-Appellants
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
J. SPENCER BELL, Circuit Judge.
The instant action involves a claim of patent infringement; the defenses raised are non-infringement and invalidity of the patent. A cross claim for a declaratory judgment of the patent’s invalidity is asserted.
The handling of frangible bulk material, in the instant action the delivery of coal from shoreside to a ship’s hold, has proved difficult where it was necessary to prevent breakage. For certain uses, it is helpful for coal lumps to be of a specific and uniform size. Coal of this type is known as “prepared coal” and is more valuable for certain commercial…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mahn v. HarwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Entron on Maryland, Inc. v. Jerrold Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- American Infra-Red Radiant Co. v. Lambert Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1977
- Oliver F. Marston v. J. C. Penney Company, Inc., Oliver F. Marston v. J. C. Penney Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- Swofford v. B & W, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Bull v. Logetronics, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1971
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.