Legal Opinion

Backstay Machine & Leather Co. v. Zenite Metal Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 19, 1923No. 3261PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Indiana. Bill in equity by the Backstay Machine & .heather Company against the Zenite Metal Company. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

AESCHURER, Circuit Judge.

The appeal is from a decree of the District Court dismissing for want of equity appellant’s bill charging infringement of United States patents to. Schemmel, Nos. 1,226,600, May 15, 1917, and. 51,804, February 19, 1918. Both relate to the upholstery art; the first being for a finishing welt for use mainly in trimming of automobile tops and bodies, furniture, and the like, and the second a design for same. The following figure is. a perspective of the device:

To the left is the strip in normal position, 2 being the parallel raised cords or beads, so attached to the body…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Backstay Machine & Leather Co. v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1920

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lowell v. TriplettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  2. McGrath Holding Corporation v. AnzellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  3. Schiller v. RobertsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1928
  4. Francisca Gutierrez v. Barcel USA, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2023
  5. McGrath Holding Corp. v. AnzellDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API