Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Lamy
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 27, 1996No. Civil Action 94-11426-REKPublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEETON, District Judge.
This is an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, by Barry Armstrong and Kim Armstrong, for civil rights violation, and under pendant jurisdiction for common-law torts and violation of Mass.Gen.L. ch. 12 § 111.
This action, filed July 14, 1994, arises out of the alleged sexual abuse of Barry Armstrong in the 1970s, when he was a teenage student at Higgins Junior High School in Peabody, Massachusetts. Defendant Michael Lamy, a music teacher at the Higgins Junior High School, allegedly had sexual contact with Barry Armstrong on school property, at Lamy’s residence, and in…
2Cases cited86 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Brum v. Town of DartmouthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Pettengill v. CurtisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Doe v. CreightonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Thomas v. Town of ChelmsfordDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- Ross v. GarabedianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.