Legal Opinion
Pettengill v. Curtis
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 30, 2008No. C.A. 07-12174-MLWPublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WOLF, District Judge.
Paul Ernst (“Ernst”), Joseph Anglim (“Anglim”), and David Park (“Park”) (collectively the “Individual Defendants”) have moved to dismiss Counts 10, 11, and 12 of the Amended Complaint against them for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). The City of Haverhill, Massachusetts (“Haverhill”) has moved to dismiss Counts 6, 7, and 8 of the Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons stated in this Memorandum, the Individual Defendants’ motions to…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Canales v. GatzunisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Orbusneich Medical Co. v. Boston Scientific Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- Noonan v. Wonderland Greyhound Park Realty LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- Da Silva v. U.S. Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- KOPLOW v. WatsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.