Doe v. Creighton
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.
The plaintiff, who has been called Jane Doe, filed a complaint on August 11, 1998, seeking damages for injuries arising from sexual abuse, some forty years after the abuse is alleged to have occurred. A judge in the Superior Court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that the plaintiff’s claims were barred by the applicable statute of limitations. In an order and unpublished memorandum pursuant to its rule 1:28, the Appeals Court reversed, citing Ross v. Garabedian, 433 Mass. 360 (2001). Doe v. Creighton, 55 Mass. App. Ct. 1111 (2002). We granted the defendant’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Riley v. PresnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Ravnikar v. BogojavlenskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- McGuinness v. CotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Dias v. Brigham Medical Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Phinney v. MorganMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Salvas v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Ryan v. Roman Catholic Bishop of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- Koe v. MercerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Pettengill v. CurtisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Harrington v. CostelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.