Legal Opinion

Byrd v. Armontrout

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided June 9, 1988No. 87-1966C-(1)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

686 F.Supp. 743 (1988)

Maurice Oscar BYRD, Petitioner,

v.

Bill ARMONTROUT, Warden, Missouri State Prison, and Attorney General of the State of Missouri, Respondents.

No. 87-1966C-(1).

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D.

May 27, 1988.

Order and Memorandum June 9, 1988.

Burton Shostak, Moline, Ottsen, Mauze Leggat & Shostak, St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Mo., for respondents.

MEMORANDUM

NANGLE, Chief Judge.

Index Page I. Introduction ......................... 750 II. Petitioner's Exhaustion of State Remedies ..................... 751 III.…

2Cases cited107 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Maurice Oscar Byrd v. William Armontrout, Warden of Missouri State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  2. McConnell v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Maurice Oscar Byrd v. Paul Delo, Superintendent, State Correctional Facility at Potosi, and Attorney General of the State of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  4. Jewell Williamson v. Jim JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  5. Robert Barks v. William Armontrout, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API