Legal Opinion
Robert Barks v. William Armontrout, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 13, 1989No. 88-1960PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge.
Robert Barks appeals from the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice Barks’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
In 1985 Barks was convicted by a jury in Missouri State Court of attempted stealing of a motor vehicle, and was sentenced as a persistent offender to a term of eight years imprisonment in the Missouri Department of Corrections. Although Barks has since been released on probation, he remains eligible for habeas corpus relief. See Jones v. Cunningham, 371 U.S. 236,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Smith v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Dugger v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Robert T. Huggins v. John Isenbarger, Chairman, Indiana Parole BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lloyd Eugene Schlup v. Bill Armontrout, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Hampton v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Lowell Woods v. Michael L. Kemna, Western Missouri Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Fletcher v. ArmontroutDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1990
- Richardson v. MillerDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.