Eureka Lake & Yuba Canal Co. v. Superior Court of Yuba
California Supreme Court
Application for a writ of review. The petitioner is a foreign corporation, organized for the sole purpose of mining by the hydraulic process, and of selling water to others to be used for a like purpose.
Read the full summary
Application for a writ of review. The petitioner is a foreign corporation, organized for the sole purpose of mining by the hydraulic process, and of selling water to others to be used for a like purpose. On October 3,1882, an action was commenced in the Superior Court of Yuba county by the county of Yuba, to enjoin the petitioner from discharging or suffering to flow into the Yuba River, or any of its tributaries, any tailings or other refuse matter from its mines, and from selling to any other person or corporation any water to be used for a purpose producing a like result. Immediately upon…
1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.
Certiorari, to review the proceedings of the respondent, in adjudging the petitioner guilty of contempt for disobedience of an injunction, and in imposing a fine.
*3141. The petitioner claims that all of the proceedings are void, under section 531, Code of Civil Procedure, the injunction having been granted without any previous notice to the petitioner. This point was considered by this court in Golden Gate C. H. Co. v. The Superior Court of Yuba County, 65 Cal. 187, and it was there held that the injunction did not suspend the general and ordinary business of the corporation, but only suspended…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Golden Gate Consolidated Hydraulic Mining Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by9 opinions
- Foley v. FoleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Chaplin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- In Re Jess Ex Rel. MorelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Shibley v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.