Legal Opinion

Norfor v. Busby

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1898No. 2904PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Whitman County. — Hon. William McDonald, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, J.

On the 7th of December, 1897, appellant commenced an action to foreclose a mortgage executed by respondent F. FT. Busby, a single man, who afterwards intermarried with the respondent, Annie E. Busby, his wife. The debt due was $13,810.44, not including costs and disbursements, and the mortgage security was upon farm lands in "Whitman county. All of the other defendants named in the action, except respondents F. M. Busby and wife, defaulted, and respondents interposed a general demurrer to the complaint which was pending when an application…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Teal v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. McMillan v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Wagar v. StoneMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Hazeltine v. GrangerMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Couper v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Morrill v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. In Re Park at Dash Point L.P.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 1990
  3. Kennebec, Inc. v. Bank of the WestWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Farm Mortgage Loan Co. v. PettetNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Western Loan & Building Co. v. MifflinWashington Supreme Court · 1931

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API