Legal Opinion

Morrill v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1917No. 13513PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Clarke county, Linn, J., entered November 15, 1915, in favor of certain defendants, upon dismissing the cross-complaint of the mortgagors claiming damages for refusal to reconvey property held under a trust deed, in an action to foreclose a mortgage.

1Opinion of the Court

Chadwick, J. —

W. F. Guernsey, the appellant husband, in company with one Kincaid, under the firm name of Guernsey & Kincaid, obtained a contract to construct a part of the Pacific highway, known as state aid road No. 61, in King county. Under the law, the contractor is required to *260give a bond conditioned for the faithful performance of his contract. Respondent Title Guaranty & Surety Company became surety for Guernsey and Kincaid. This respondent will be referred to as the surety company. To secure it from possible liability upon the bond, it took a deed to a certain block of land situate at…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cohn v. NeevesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Williams v. HendricksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  3. Norfor v. BusbyWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Dane v. DanielWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Poledori v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Maynard Inv. Co., Inc. v. McCannWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Ford v. LoganWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Barquin v. Hall Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  4. State Ex Rel. Donohue v. CoeWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Rustad Heating & Plumbing Co. v. WaldtWashington Supreme Court · 1979

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API